Showing posts with label ACE. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ACE. Show all posts

Monday, January 11, 2010

Chatterbox Challenge 2010




In its 10th year, in the 60th anniversary of Turing's Computing Machinery and Intelligence, 'can a machine think?' game Chatterbox Challenge launches its 2010 contest.

Alternative to the Loebner Prize, the Chatterbox Challenge galvanises:

Botmasters

- Improves your skills in building your bot.

- Benchmarks your bot intelligence for free.

- Makes your bot win prizes based on his intelligence and personality.

- Gets your bot more popular and reviewed by visitors.

Visitors

- Gives you the opportunity to judge and review chatbots.

- Helps you to vote for the best chatbot.

- Shows the latest and the most innovative techniques in Artificial Intelligence.

- Is a good reason to start building your own bot.

Sponsors

- Shows you new innovative techniques to run your business.

- Helps you to get in touch with the world wide talents.

- Makes you more popular with a higher page rank.

- Gets you associated with innovative industry for present and future.



Developers can enter their artificial conversational entities - ACE here. Chatterbox Challenge history can be viewed here.

Judges wishing to assess systems (between March and May) can contact the Organiser here.

Saturday, May 09, 2009

Can a machine think? Report on the Turing tests in Loebner Prize 2008

How Loebner 2008 Prize judges determined that the artificial agents were not thinking (in the human sense) included:

1. ...the ACE did not make spelling mistakes in contrast to the hidden-humans ... this is a "fairly key signifier of human-ness"

2. ... 'speed of response' and 'length of utterance': If an entity replied very quickly with a long sentence, or asked a question in response to a question, it was more likely to be a machine; whereas if a discussion developed with a hidden entity answering ... questions, then they were likely to be human.

Another judge correctly identified the gender of hidden-humans, against whom the artificial conversational agents were compared:

.. male as "less conversational (short answers, to the point)" and female hidden-humans as "quite happy to tell me a lot about themselves and their life".


From the organisers' report on Loebner Prize 2008, with ACE finalist's average scores here.